The Netherlands was against any reference to the motivation of a mercenary altogether. Cameroon, for example, stated that “it would be very difficult to prove that a mercenary received exorbitant pay”. At the Diplomatic Conference leading to the adoption of the Additional Protocols, Afghanistan, Cameroon, Cuba, Mauritania, Nigeria and Zaire expressed their opposition to this formulation. In addition, the definition requires evidence that a person accused of being a mercenary is “motivated to take part in the hostilities essentially by the desire for private gain” and is promised “material compensation substantially in excess of that promised or paid to combatants of similar ranks and functions in the armed forces”. This definition is very restrictive because it requires that all six conditions be cumulatively fulfilled.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |